SYRIANA

I found it surprising that the ajomrity of the blog posts agreed with the Humanistic/Interpretive Approach. However, what caught my attention was your opinion towards the Scientific Approach. I agree that it’s important to see the connection and interaction between humans and other animals. Nobody should deny the fact that the Scientific Approach explains culture in a more systematic way. Evolution, genetics, natural selection, materialism, and altruism are all significant in studying culture. This allows anthropologists to look at the different patterns between cultures. On the other hand, what the Scientific Approach fails to acknowledge is the complexity within each culture. Generalized will lead us to interpret all cultures as one. I just feel that it’s also important to consider why humans are culturally and linguistically unique. Social changes over time for humans should not be categorized into scientific patterns because that doesn’t explain what makes each culture distinct.It was interesting to consider how Syriana demonstrated a Scientific Approach to cultures and society. I also agree with how materialism explains the idea of a human being selfish. The film definitely showed how humans take first what is most important to create a society, as you pointed out. Perhaps we should also consider ways in which Syriana demonstrated a Humanist/Interpretive Approach. The fact that there are cultural interactions between the US and the Middle East shows how we are socially connected, despite our differences. Without understanding how particular cultures function and how each is unique, humans won’t be able to emphasize the cultural symbols that exist only in certain areas. Therefore, it’s also impo

Ovviamente, kekkoz, siamo in pvliecoae disaccordo. Non l'ho trovato antropocentrico, non piu' di quanto fosse necessario all'esposizione della tesi.Quanto a crash puf2 senz'altro irritare perche' e' un film piacione e sfrontato. A me tutto sommato non e'dipiaciuto. Ma good night and good luck e' altra cosa.E' vero quest'anno mancava il titolo dominante, ha vinto la sorpresa. Su capote sono d'accordo forse e' un film discretamente sottovalutato.Si' hai ragione sullo sceneggiatore di traffic ma io intendevo emulo di traffic anche con riferimento alla messa in scena. Per segnale orario accade qualche volta e di solito sono cosi' sfrontati nel fare cose terribili che finiscono per essrere prevedibili